Mixing Regular and Synthetic Motor Oils

Heres a practical chemistry question for you: Do you know what happens if you mix regular and synthetic motor oil? Lets say the mechanic put synthetic oil in your car when you got your oil changed. You stop at a gas station and see you are running about a quart low, but all you can get is regular motor oil. Is it alright to use the regular oil or will you risk harming your engine by doing so? Mixing Motor Oil According to Mobil Oil, it should be fine to mix oils. This manufacturer states it would be unlikely anything bad would happen, such as a gel-forming from an interaction of the chemicals (a common fear), because the oils are compatible with each other. Many oils are a blend of natural and synthetic oils. So, if you are low on oil, dont be afraid to add a quart or two of synthetic oil if you are using regular oil or even regular oil if you are using a synthetic. You dont need to rush right out and get an oil change so youll have pure oil. Possible Negative Effects It is not recommended to routinely mix oils because the additives in different products may interact or the oils may become destabilized by the mixture. You may reduce or negate the properties of the additives. You could lose the benefits of the more expensive synthetic oil. So, adding regular oil to your special synthetic oil will mean youll need to get your oil changed sooner than you would have otherwise. If you have a high-performance engine, its possible it will be displeased if the (expensive) additives cant work the way they are supposed to. This may not damage your engine, but it wont help its performance. The Difference Between Regular and Synthetic Oil Both conventional and synthetic motor oils are derived from petroleum, but they can be very different products. Conventional oil is refined from crude oil. It circulates through the engine to keep it cool and prevent wear by acting as a lubricant. It helps prevent corrosion, keeps surfaces clean, and seals the engine. Synthetic oil serves the same purpose, but its tailored for higher temperature and pressure. Synthetic oil is also refined, but then its distilled and purified so that it contains fewer impurities and a smaller, select set of molecules. Synthetic oil also contains additives intended to help keep an engine cleaner and protect it from damage. The main difference between regular and synthetic oil is the temperature at which it undergoes thermal degradation. In a high-performance engine, regular oil is more apt to pick up deposits and form sludge. Cars that run hot do better with synthetic oil. For most automobiles, the only real difference youll see is that synthetic costs more initially but lasts longer between oil changes.

Correlation Between Crime And Crime - 1976 Words

Society is imbued with a deep fixation to understand the prevalence of criminality: who is doing the crime and why? The frequency of crime, however, will never be completely reported or discovered, which is attributable to its somewhat clandestine nature. This phenomenon is underscored by criminologists and sociologists as, the ‘dark figure of crime’; only crime that has been reported can be measured. We are painted with a partial picture of reality, but not reality itself. There are two principal sources of data regarding crime measurement. Crimes recorded by police form the basis of official statistics and alternative measures, such as crime victim surveys and self-report surveys are other methods to measure crime and gain a more†¦show more content†¦2008). The proportion of different crimes represented is the inverse of official statistics. This essay concludes with the proposition that there is no flawless methodology that will idyllically depict the full ex tent of crime. In Australia, there is no single body of criminal law governing the whole nation; each jurisdiction has its own set of criminal laws and major differences can therefore exist, such as the definition of certain offences and their range of seriousness (Chilvers, 1998, Ross, 1999). What is measured depends on how each state defines crime (Skogan, 1977). The Australian and New Zealand Standard Offence Classification (ANZSOC) is a uniform national statistical framework that overcomes differences in legal offence definitions across states and territories to provide national crime statistics (ABS, 2011). Three broad strands within criminology that deal with how to measure crime can be identified as the realist, institutionalist and critical approaches, each reflecting different assumptions that produce different knowledges (Block, Block, 1984). The realist approach endeavours to expose the dark figure of crime to statistical light. This approach understands the role of criminology is to supplement the limitations of official statistics through alternative data recording measures, including, but not limited to victimisation surveys (Block Block, 1984). Yet criminologists that adopt the institutionalist approach argue that

Cutting Down on Your Computer Time Free Essays

Nowadays the teenagers spend most of their time on the computer. The internet can be used for relaxation, entertainment and information. Google is a very well-known site that people went to search for further knowledge. We will write a custom essay sample on Cutting Down on Your Computer Time or any similar topic only for you Order Now However, too much computer may lead to health problems such as backache and eye strain. Studies show that young people who spend too much time in front of computer may have social problems, less family interaction and fewer friends. Besides, they also lack of exercise and most importantly their study time has reduced. To stop wasting time on computer and start organizing time for your studies just follow these simple steps to cut down on your computer time. Firstly, keep a record of how much time u spend on your computer and see how much time u have wasted on your computer. Next, do not use the computer just because you are jobless. Find something else to do such as reading a book. Engaging with a good novel or non-fiction work is a great way to distract yourself from the day’s tasks, refresh your batteries, and inspire new ideas. Then, prepare a timetable which reduces the time on your computer but more time for recreation and study. Last but not least, spend more time studying, recreation or interacting with your family. In time to come, your study time has organized and you have your new hobbies. You even have more time with your family and friends. Furthermore, u can even stay healthy and alert. Be a smart user, time is gold, do not let it waste all your time. How to cite Cutting Down on Your Computer Time, Essay examples

Does Trail By Jury Need Reform Essay free essay sample

Does Trail By Jury Need Reform? Essay, Research Paper Question: How far do you hold with the proposal that test by jury should be radically reformed? ( note this is an English jurisprudence essay ) In the last twelvemonth a figure of legal reforms have been proposed by the current authorities. First there are the Mode of Trial Bills, presently No. 2 is traveling through it? s readings. No.1 failed to do it through the hosiery of Lords. Then there is the Auld study that recommends a extremist restructuring of the tribunal system and cutting down on the figure of instances that are tried by the Crown Court. One country that all of these undertakings seek to reform is test by jury as it is claimed to expensive, open to mistreat and clip devouring for all parties involved. There is no historical right to test by jury. The Magna Carter makes no mention to it, popular misconception non defying. We will write a custom essay sample on Does Trail By Jury Need Reform Essay or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Its first happening in a recognizable signifier can be seen the 12th century, during the reign of Henry II. Here the jury consisted of the accused friends and neighbors instead than today? s twelve indiscriminately selected grownups. Previous to this the jury was a Norman convention made up of 12 work forces prepared to curse on curse as to the individuals artlessness. Failure to acquire the twelve work forces confirmed guilt since curses so had a spiritual ardor and no 1 would run hazard of ageless damnation by lying under curse. Trial by ordeal ceased in 1215 after it was condemned by Catholic Pope guiltless III. Trial by conflict, to the decease between accuser and suspect, existed by legislative act at the same clip and was non repealed until 1819. A of import and alone portion of the English legal system is that of drumhead trail by magistrates. In this a panel of, normally, three ballad people hear the instance and make up ones mind on fact, guilt and any penalty. Magistrates account for upwards of 97 % of all judicial hearings today. In 1855 such was the work load of chargeable instances coming before the common jurisprudence tribunals that an act was passed leting such instances to be settled without a jury if the parties agreed to it. This effort to rush up the wheels of justness created the? either manner? instances that are now being blamed for decelerating the same wheels down. Over the following 150 old ages more offenses were added to the either manner list and more instances lost their entitlement to test by jury most of them being civil cases.1 Jury reform is both a popular academic inquiry and 1 that has seen much attending from authorities and royal committees. The last half of the 20th century has seen a figure of reforms of the jury system In brief these are: The first was the leting of bulk finding of facts ( 1967 ) . If a consentaneous finding of fact is non forthcoming the justice may accept a bulk finding of fact with either one or two dissenting ballots depending on the size of the jury at the tests determination stage. 1974 saw the remotion of the belongings making now jurymans could be selected from the grownup voting population between the ages of 18 and 70 topic to a figure of exempt professions. Courts dwelling of a individual justice were introduced into Northern Ireland in the 1970s to counter the job of jury bullying in terrorist instances. These Diplock tribunals exist today. Research into how juries reach their determinations was prevented by the Contempt of tribunal act 1981 The Supreme Court Act 1981specified for what civil instances could a jury could be empanelled and added that in civil instances where there is likely to be complex drawn-out scrutiny of histories, scientific grounds test by jury could be deemed against the best involvement of justness. There are a figure of single countries of jury reform being investigated. These are the jury composing and choice, the right to test by jury and that of perverse finding of facts. Each of these will be discussed in bend below. The juries act 1974 lists contains three parts sketching groups of people whom are either excused of right or ineligible for jury service. Those non on these lists can seek to be excused on evidences of professional or concern loss that would be incurred or household committednesss such as kid attention. An statement against juries s that they can non follow complex statements. If members of the legal profession were eligible for jury service and others of the professional trades non excused on evidences of fiscal loss so the degree of the juries understanding would lift. In New York province, America, everyone can be called to function as a juryman and Judgess A ; attorneies who have done so hold found the experience enlightening. Long complex fraud, calumny or political tests could see a figure of jurymans drop out due to illness or emphasize and go forth the jury below the lower limit of 10 for a crown tribunal test. The curse in of modesty jurymans if justice thinks instance is traveling to travel on for a long clip to could forestall the jury going to little. All jurymans sit in and the panel of 12 is selected at terminal of test. This would affect some change to the jury box but as tribunal edifices are already having refits to upgrade their installations in the jury waiting room the extra break would be minimum. Much of the incrimination for the juries failure to understand fraud instances is laid on the Serious Fraud Office and its inability to show the grounds in an apprehensible format non on an deficiency of intelligence of the jury. In England the defense mechanism has no right to object to jurymans this being lost in 1988 despite there being no grounds that it was being abused to lade a jury. Although the prosecution has retained theirs. Occasionally the jury will be vetted if there is danger of media induced prejudices adversely impacting the equity of a trail. The issue of race ever arises when discoursing juries. The jury is predominately white and those of other tegument tones consider that they will non acquire a just trail. Cultural minorities are partially underrepresented by their failure to register as electors with 13 % of those from the Indian sub-continent and a one-fourth of all other minorities non registering. Both the Runciman and Auld studies suggest that the jury could be loaded to include three members of cultural minorities with one of these from the suspects race if it is likely that race is traveling to be a major issue in the test. Although non a race issue the Welsh linguistic communication besides causes complications. In the princedom legal proceedings can be conducted in Welsh instead than English. However few in Wales really speak the linguistic communication. Canada [ still ] has a similar job with proceedings for Gallic talkers and besides the native Inuit linguistic communication. Where a prospective juryman is clearly unable to understand sufficient English the prosecution should utilize their right to? stand by? the juryman. The defense mechanisms peremptory challenge was abolished in 1988 because statically more instances were acquitted where the defense mechanism used this right than when they did non. The right of election in either manner instances was established in 1855. It was nevertheless a right granting of drumhead trail by magistrate and non the gaining of a right to drag by jury as modern oppositions of trail by jury are stating or as the MP for Montgomery put it? the Soviet-style revising of history? .2 The proposed Mode of test ( No.2 ) measure is designed to cut down the figure of either manner instances that go to the crown tribunal. It argues that the bulk of suspects plead guilty when they reach the crown tribunal. This figure ignores those who are acquitted and disregards to advert that frequently the CPS will down rate the original charges to something less terrible, hopefully, giving a better opportunity of strong belief. The logical thinking behind the measure says that suspects choose the crown tribunal because they think that a jury is more likely to assoil them,3 it delays the prison sentence or at least allows some of it to be served in more comfort while expecting trail. Presently 80 % of either ways elect to be summarily tried by the magistrates. Of those who go to the crown tribunal on 2 in 7 are the defendant elections the staying five are directed at that place by the magistrates. The chief compliant against fring the right to elect which tribunal the suspect is tried is that magistrates one time they have decided on guilt can mention the instance to the crown tribunal for condemning where they consider their sentencing powers insufficient. This is at odds with the authoritiess projected benefit that a individual non holding a test by jury will non acquire the stronger crown tribunal imposed sentence and makes a jeer of? 66 million economy caused by the shorter tutelary magistrate imposed sentencing. No affair what tribunal the suspect should, with the consent of the tribunal, elect to be tried by justice entirely without a jury. On history of extremely proficient grounds or necessitating an account of the opinion which would uncover any errors and open the manner for entreaty. But is non this making the same pick that started the whole? either manner? issue in the first topographic point? Will in another 150 old ages the facts be presented to connote that there was neer any right to drag by jury Occasionally the jury will return a finding of fact that the justice and prosecution is non happy about ; these are known as perverse finding of facts by others as pious bearing false witness. Paragraphs 99-108 of the Auld study recommends that? legislative acts should be put in topographic point declaring that juries have no right to assoil in rebelliousness of the jurisprudence? . It should besides foster recommend that the brass plaque reverencing the jury of the 1670 Bushell instance, where it was established the jury as the exclusive finder of fact and could give a finding of fact harmonizing to their scruples, be removed and hidden off someplace. Auld ( paragraphs 66-67 ) goes on to state that the prosecution should hold a right of entreaty if the jury return a perverse finding of fact which is perchance a breach of the dual hazard regulation. However the Judgess of today must retrieve that it was their predecessors who helped created the tendency for perverse finding of facts in the early 1800s. A noteworthy illustration being Lord Mansfield who directed a jury to under value a bangle to convey its value below 40 shillings and therefore avoid the decease punishment. When the suspect protested that the bangles manner value entirely was more Mansfield replied? God forbid, gentleman, we should hang a adult male for manner entirely? . 4 If the intent of the jury if it is to entirely to happen fact and make up ones mind on point of jurisprudence so the best policy would be to trash the adversarial system and travel to an inquisitorial 1 that determines all the facts and all the points of jurisprudence as opposed to merely those elements that the attorneies choose to uncover. Or to inquire, as American tribunals can really on occasion do, for a particular finding of fact where the jury decide the facts and present these to the justice who decides on jurisprudence, guilt and sentence. Lord Devlin stated that trail by jury is non so much an instrument at acquiring at the truth as a procedure to guarantee that no guiltless individual is convicted. 5 The legal profession serves the jurisprudence. The jurisprudence nevertheless serves the populace. ? ? Law is derived from and is an look of society? s morality? In the absence of moral committedness to back up it, jurisprudence ceases being portion of society? .6 Society is supposed to act upon the jurisprudence by the nature of the authorities they elect in. However as both major parties are trying to out place each other by acquiring tougher on offense the lone topographic point where the populace can truly act upon the jurisprudence is from the jury box. If the jurisprudence does non reflect the norms of society the jury will interpret facts, in their ain head, such that the jurisprudence suggested by the justice is non applicable to the instance before them Though it is unlikely the jury may hold read the undermentioned transition by a instead celebrated author on law ? a individuals may be punished if, and merely if, he has voluntarily done something morally incorrect ; secondly, that his penalty must in some manner lucifer, or be tantamount of, the evil of his offense? taking to? what kind of behavior may be punished? ? , ? How badly? ? , and? What is the justification for the penalty? Hart, HLA. Punishment A ; Responsibility p230 Could it be that the jury is using the spirit of the jurisprudence and non the missive. The legal profession is construing harmonizing to the actual regulation but the jury knows merely, instinctively, of the aureate regulation? The jury has entire freedom to make up ones mind. More in fact than the Law Lords for, despite the 1966 pattern statement, they are still bound by rule of stare decisis. Lord Halsham summed this state of affairs up in 1967? to make justness harmonizing to the jurisprudence as it is, and non harmonizing to the province of personal businesss as they wish it to be? .7 Who so proceeded to project his ballot against his declared moral place. It is slightly unusual that as trail by jury is get downing to look in former Eastern axis states and is being reintroduced into Spain and perchance Japan for a limited figure of instances that its usage in England where it originated is worsening. The Government claims that attorneies see the loss of trail by jury as a menace to their incomes nevertheless the entreaty procedure against a magistrates determination to perpetrate the instance to summary trail offers many chances for entreaties and challenges in a whole new field Justice is being seen, by the authorities, as a merchandise ; the disposal of which is being redesigned to be every bit efficient as possible. The design of the legal system has ever been to maintain the greatest bulk of instances heard in the magistrates where they can be processed rapidly and cheaply. With the complexness of instances increasing it is clip to drop such a mathematical attack to justness. If the tribunals can non get by with the volume of instances in a timely manner so the setup of justness should be expanded non its mechanics changed. Trail by jury should non be sold for a better bottom line in the legal systems histories FootnotesThe civil instances that are still entitled to drag by jury are fraud, distortion of character, and two others Hansard 27 Feb 1997 Column 436 In 2001 juries acquitted 25 % of instances compared with 17 % in 1997. Hypertext transfer protocol: //WWW.LAWTUTORSONLINE.CO.UK/NEWS.HTM 2/12/01 Is our jury system so perverse, The Observer October 14, 2001 HTTP: //WWW.OBSERVER.CO.UK? COMMENTS? STORY? 0,6903,573601,00.HTMLKalven and Zeisel, 1966, p190 cited in Justice Democracy and the Jury James p13 Emile Durkin cited in SWOT Jurisprudence pp130-138 Cited in The New British PoliticsBibliographyBerlins, B and Dyer, C ( 2000 ) The Law Machine. 10th Edition. Penguin Budge, I. ( 2000 ) The new British Politicss. 2nd Edition. Longman Cracknel, D G. ( 1994 ) Cracknell? s Statutes English Legal System. Old Bailey Press Gobert, J. ( 1998 ) Justice, democracy and the Jury. Dartmouth Printing Hart, HLA. ( 1968 ) Punishment A ; Responsibility. Oxford University Press Lawtutors ( 2001 ) News update Randel, M ( 2001 ) Is our jury system so perverse. The Observer October 14th Wacks, R. ( 1990 ) , SWOT Jurisprudence. 2nd Edition, Blackstone Press. Wilson, S R. ( 1996 ) SWOT English Legal System. 3rd Edition, Blackstone Press.

The Titanic Essay Thesis Example For Students

The Titanic Essay Thesis On April 14,1912 a great ship called the Titanic sank on its maiden voyage. That night there were many warnings of icebergs from other ships. There seems to be a conflict on whether or not the warnings reached the bridge. We may never know the answer to this question. The greatest tragedy of all may be that there were not enough lifeboats for everyone on board. According to Walter Lord, author of The Night Lives On, the Titanic could have been saved in the very beginning of the crisis when the iceberg was first reported to the bridge. If First Officer Murdoch had steamed right at the iceberg instead of trying to avoid it, he might have saved the ship. The author feels there would have been a loud crash and anyone within the first one hundred feet would have been killed, but the ship would have remained afloat(82). This view was entirely speculation and we will never really know if this would have happened. In contrast, Geoffrey Marcus, author of The Maiden Voyage, suggests that the b ridge did not receive warning of the ice from the very beginning. One of the messages received was from the Masaba warning the Titanic of a mass of ice lying straight ahead. According to Marcus, the message never reached the bridge, but instead was shoved under a paper-weight (126). At 10:30 p.m. that evening, a ship going the opposite direction of the Titanic was sighted. This ship, the Rappahannock, had emerged from an ice field and had sustained damage to its rudder. The vessel signaled the Titanic about the ice and the Titanic replied that the message was received (Marcus 127). At 11 p.m. another ice report was received. This one was from the Californian. This liner had passed through the same ice field that the Rappahannock had reported to the Titanic. Like all the other warnings, this warning never reached the bridge though it was known to both of the Titanics wireless operators (Marcus 128). By the time the bridge realized the ship was about to hit an iceberg, it was too late . Quartermaster Hitchens tried to turn the wheel hard to the starboard. Twenty seconds later, he had an order for full speed astern but the iceberg was too close. The starboard side hit the iceberg, bringing a block of ice onto the deck (Pellegrino 21). After the collision occurred, there was only one thing open for Captain Smith to do. It was almost midnight and he gave the order to take to the lifeboats (Lord, Lives On 82). This decision brought Captain Smith face-to-face with the fact that there were 2,201 people on board and enoughlifeboats for only 1,178 people (Lord, Lives On 83). The Captain was going to have to make a choice as to who would be the first allowed on the lifeboats. Around 12:30 a.m. the bridge informed the crew that only women and children would be loaded on the lifeboats (Eaton,Haas,152). By 1:30 a.m., there was panic among some of the passengers. One example was on the port side of the boat. A group of passengers threatened to jump into a boat full of passeng ers. To scare them, one of the officers fired three shots on the ships side. The warning proved to be successful. Nobody was injured and the passengers calmed down (Eaton and Haas 154). At the last moments with only forty seven available spaces on the last lifeboat, the crew instructed everyone to form a circle around the boat. Women and children were the only people permitted to pass through the circle. A little while after the last lifeboat left, the stern lifted clear out of the water with more than 1500 people still on board (Eaton and Haas 157-161). The climatic moment came at 2:20 a.m. The Titanic stood perpendicular to the water. As people in the lifeboats looked on, they noticed the ship stayed perpendicular for a minute and then disappeared to the bottom of the ocean (Lord, Lives on 137). Captain Rostron of the ship Carpathia determined the distance to the Titanic and quickly calculated the course to answer the Titanics distress call (Eaton and Haas 177). Once the Carpathia reached the lifeboats, it did not take long to load the passengers on board. It was 4:45 a.m. when the last lifeboat was loaded on board. The survivors peered around the Promenade Deck, searching for family members lost (Lord, To Remember 152-53). Why wasnt their enough lifeboats for everyone? The Titanic came under a regulating board that made laws for vessels over 10,000 tons. In 1894 only twenty lifeboats were needed. This number was never changed when the size of ships increased, and because of this, over a thousand lives were lost (Lord, Lives On 84). Another problem with the lifeboats was that there was no consistency in loading them. To Officer Lightoller, women and children first meant no men were allowed to board. In many cases this meant many lifeboats were not filled to maximum capacity. Officer Murdoch put men on the lifeboats when there were no women around. Therefore, a mans life or death , depended on what side of the ship he was standing on (Lord, Lives on 116). On a luxury ship, lifeboats for everyone would mean less room for games and sports on the upper decks. Passengers would have had to give up play areas for lifeboats (Lord, Lives On 85). White Star line tragically sacrificed safety for luxury. The question remains whether or not first and second class passengers received preference on the lifeboats. The White Star line claims there was no distinction between the three classes of passengers, however, only 25 percent of third class passengers were saved compared to 53 percent of first and second class passengers. The White Star line explained that third class passengers were more reluctant to leave the ship and they did not want to part from their belongings. The surviving crew of the Titanic also claimed that there was no discrimination. Yet at the British Inquiry of the accident, not a single third class passenger was called as a witness (Lord, Lives On 93-94). One aspect of the tragedy that the White Star line can be proud of is the fa ct that the Titanic was spared a panic. The crew did not try to go on lifeboats ahead of the passengers as they did when the French liner La Bourgogne went down in 1898. Most of the passenger remained calm and the crew did their duty ( Lord, Lives On 127). One of the most intriguing mysteries of the tragedy was surrounding the ships band. It is believed the band played right to the end. Where or what they played remains a great mystery, as eyewitness accounts vary greatly (Lord, Lives On 135). Five days after the Titanic sank, the Bremen was on its way to New York. The passengers saw victims of the Titanic in the ocean. We saw the body of one woman dressed only in her night dress, and clasping a baby to her breast, one the passengers recalled. Another passenger of the Bremen later reported : Close by was the body of another woman with her arms tightly clasped around a shaggy dog We saw the bodies of three men in a group, all clinging to a chair. Floating by just beyond them were the bodies of a dozen men, all wearing life belts and clinging desperately together as though in their last struggle for life. (Ward 180) The aftermath of the disaster changed the way people thought about the sea and ships. If one lesson was learned, it was that there needs to be enough lifeboats for everyone on a ship. Luxuries should always come second to a passengers safety. Since the time of this disaster, every ship has enough lifeboats for everyone on board and also performs mandatory lifeboat drills. Walter Lord, the author of A Night to Remember , remarked that :The Titanic has come to stand for a world of tranquillity and civility that we have somehow lost In 1912, people had confidence. Now nobody is sure of anything and the more uncertain we become , the more we long for a happier era when we felt we knew the answers. (170) In 1985, Dr. Robert Ballard of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution in Massachusetts set out to find the Titanic. That summer, he went aboard the U.S . Navy research ship Knorr. The ship used its sonar equipment to explore eighty percent of the ocean floor where the Titanic was believed to be. On September 1, after studying the video screens, Dr. Ballard discovered where the Titanic was lying. On a second expedition made in July of 1986, Ballard brought his small vessel called the Alvin to the site. His findings were as follows: Contrary to a long-held belief, the Titanic had not been sliced open by the iceberg. Instead, the researchers found that the ships starboard bow plates had buckled under the impact of the collision, thereby opening up the ship to the sea. Another major discovery was that the stern of the Titanic had wrenched itself away from the rest of the ship in its descent to the bottom. (Ward 186) The last survivor of the Titanic recently died in her home in Massachusetts. With her death, many of the unanswered questions of the Titanic may have also died. Hopefully, a tragedy like this will never have to happen again . As stated before, ships are now expected to have enough lifeboats for everyone on board. Ships also route their lanes farther to the south during iceberg season. .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 , .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .postImageUrl , .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 , .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:hover , .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:visited , .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:active { border:0!important; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:active , .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99 .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u4439df8c91109af474305058d73a2f99:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Exile or Revelation? Sample Essay We will write a custom essay on The Titanic Thesis specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Hopefully in some small way this will make a difference if such an accident at sea should ever occur again. Work Cited Eaton, John P., and Charles A. Haas. Titanic: Triumph and Tragedy. New York: W. W. Norton ; Company, 1986. PP 152-184. Pellegrino, Charles. Her Name Titanic. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, 1988. PP 20-21. Marcus, Geoffrey. The Maiden Voyage. New York: The Viking Press, 1969. PP 35-128. Lord, Walter. A Night To Remember. Mattituck: American House, 1955. PP 152-170. . The Night Lives On. New York: William Morrow and Company, Inc., 1986. PP 82-137. Ward, Kaari, ed. Great Disasters. Pleasantville: The Readers Digest Association, Inc., 1989. PP 180-87. *****************************************************************

The Dos and Don’ts for Sharing Opinions in an Interview

The Dos and Don’ts for Sharing Opinions in an Interview â€Å"It’s not polite to discuss politics or religion.† We’ve all heard it- and it’s good policy in the workplace, where people of all perspectives come together to get the job done. But how should you handle it if someone else- specifically, an interviewer- asks you for your opinion on a controversial subject? Here are 5 tips to keep in mind as you prep for your interview.DON’T feel obligated to answer.This is not a question that should come up in the course of a regular job interview. Maybe the interviewer is taking advantage of a casual setting (say, over a lunch during an extended interview process), or is just not aware of what’s appropriate and what’s not. Just because someone may be able to offer you a job does not mean they’re entitled to truth serum-level answers. Would you give him or her your Social Security number? Your bank account balance? You should consider your personal opinions just that†¦personal. Youâ₠¬â„¢re not obligated to give a full and honest answer if you’re asked for your opinion.DO respond with a question.In a case like this it’s perfectly fair to answer with a cautious question of your own, like â€Å"what makes you ask?† You may just be stalling for time and hoping to defuse the line of inquiry, but it’s a legitimate next step.DON’T use it as a launchpad for your favorite political rant.It may seem like an open opportunity to unleash the real you, but that’s deceptive. If you do give your honest opinion about abortion/gun control/healthcare reform, you run the risk of alienating the interviewer. Sure, it wasn’t especially fair of them to set you up like that, but human nature being what it is, they may disqualify you based on your opinions and not your qualifications.I fell prey to this temptation once, as an intern in college. I was 19, and was positive I had politics all figured out. During a lunch with colleagues, I sh ot off at the mouth about my disdain for the president at the time- only to find out later that one of the colleagues present was a huge supporter of President [name redacted]. I wasn’t asked to return to that group the next summer. In all likelihood that wasn’t the main reason, but it could have been. And I still cringe when I think about how unprofessional it was for me to unleash my righteous political fury at a work lunch.DO try to change the topic.It’s okay to give a mild, middle-of-the-road response and then move back to the interview track. If the interviewer asks you about your political affiliation, try something along the lines of, â€Å"I’m pretty fed up with all politicians these days. I’m more interested in what I can do every day to make things better.† It may sound lame, but at least it dodges a potential bullet.DON’T open the door to this question yourself.If your notebook has a â€Å"Feel the Bern† campaign sti cker on it, or you have a â€Å"Make America Great Again† tattoo, make sure those are out of sight when you walk into the interview. Similarly, if you’re, say, a vegan and you object to the fancy leather shoes the interviewer is wearing, don’t go out of your way to point out the folly of his ways. Again, this should be about your qualifications- not your personal views and beliefs. You probably won’t be able to convince this person of the superiority of your opinion in one sitting, and even if you do, you’ve already put yourself in a box before you even get a job offer.There’s plenty of time to talk about your personal opinions with friends and family, or on anonymous internet news comment sections. The job interview is just not the place for it. And if you’re asked to bring in your personal opinions on potentially controversial topics, you should feel comfortable in sidestepping that land mine.

Charges against 'sexting' teenagers highlight legal gaps by Alexandra Essay

Charges against 'sexting' teenagers highlight legal gaps by Alexandra Marks - Essay Example While the government is doing its best to protect young people from exploitation in ways it believes are most appropriate, some strongly hold the contrary view that teenagers of today would grow up fine, the same way those before them did, without the need of arbitrary laws that often stereotype and brand them as something they are not or, worse, turn them into something that society abhors-criminals. The article, moreover, elucidates that many of today's minors are being punished to suffer a penalty for something that some members of society do not even essentially consider as sin. According to them, there are certain things whose magnitude demands for formal social controls (in the form of laws controlling such behavior), yet there are things that are best dealt with within the family, as they have always been dealt with in the past few years. This issue connects with every facet of social structure by triggering differing opinions on the gravity of the matter as an issue of right and wrong, legal and illegal. Indeed, what is legal does not necessarily mean to be also moral, and vice versa. It is to be noted that every social strata, group, organization, and institution has its own perception of good or bad that, as expected and is but natural, would often come at variance with that of other units of society as explained by its differing social orientations. It is to be remembered that each of these units have influenced in one way or the other the shaping of these teenagers, as well as the shaping of laws and society's general sentiment on the issues. What the Issue Says about Our Society This issue tells us that society is a complex web of differing individuals that shape it and, in turn, are likewise shaped by it. The complexity of how society works is founded on the interplay of several aspects, such as power, values and norms, and shared or differing views of life in general. Societal values and norms, for example, determine what ways of doing things are acceptable to society and is often the main basis upon which laws are founded, though some concepts pertaining to power and influence cannot be discredited as well. Indeed, some are more powerful and influential than others; thus, they are more able to impose their perceived values and norms upon the entire society. Also, there is often, always a variation in what people may perceive as a shared view among everyone in a society. While most people agree that teenagers need moral guidance or protection, some prefer stringent measures, while others believe that such things are best resolved within the confines of the home and should only be discussed between parents and children. For in society's effort to save these children, it could instead lead it further astray, which takes a herculean effort to reverse. The Relationship between the People Involved and the Larger Society or Community While the people involved may not feel strongly that this issue is of a matter public concern, still there are some who believe that they exercise a moral responsibility to society as a whole. The latter feel that it is their bounden duty to protect the morals of society. It, however, should be noted that while a teenager may only look at the issue of sexting from his or her viewpoint, our